It is Not Objectification if Women Do it to Themselves

Rule 286 of the unwritten and ever changing code of modern feminism is so obvious to certain women that it hardly needs to be written (it being intuitive for women), but for all the meat-heads out there who still don't get it explanation is clearly still needed.

It may be true that women of yesteryear were turned into little more than objects of sexual fulfillment and service to men. Men would ogle them in magazines and appreciate them only for their physical attributes. They had to make sandwiches for their men and welcome them home with a smile.

If you go back far enough in time, the patriarchy bought and sold women, married as many women as they wanted, had mistresses without concern, and basically used women as objects of personal pleasure and entertainment alone. In places like ancient Rome, men and only men could throw a woman's greatest treasure, her child, out with the morning garbage. In America in the 50's, women had to wear high heels while delivering beer to their husbands on couches.

But today women are teaching us about true womanhood. They have fought long and hard for their precious freedoms. Lots of celebrities and empowered women like Beyonce, Madonna, Jennifer Lopez, and Shakira, are boldly using their newly won freedoms to provide sexual entertainment to men and advocate for the rights of women alone to kill their unborn children if they want to do so. In these days of progress and societal evolution, it is the women who are providing the sexual entertainment and also easing the consequences of unattached sexual liaisons through abortion.

If it weren’t for all the men objectifying women without women initiating it as a poetical demonstration of empowerment, we would have arrived at a golden age for women. But it seems clear that men still have a lot of work to do.

Woman Committed to Gluten Free and Organic Food, Eastern Meditation, Hemp Kombucha, and Lymphatic Drainage Massage Dies at 47

Sausalito, California

Lilith O’Hara led an exemplary life. She walked daily, ate only gluten free and absurdly expensive organic food. She faithfully practiced yoga and pilates and hiked the Sierra Nevada. She strutted about confidently revealing an eerily thin frame of approximately 3% body fat, utterly expunging any trace of femininity from her body. But for Lilith, this was not a problem, because she was androgynously beautiful to herself. She was still single at 47 because she intimidated men and women by her overall excellence and severe beauty.

According to authorities in Mono County, California, Lilith was out hiking on Sunday and encountered a bear and was eaten alive, the bear not being one of the California vegan bears. 

Lilith's death might be considered ironic to some with an overly inflated sense of irony, but really her death is merely a poetic demonstration of the beauty of the circle of life. 

Man Who Claims Humans Make Up Morality Morally Outraged by Christians

Saratoga, CA

Podcaster, Blogger, YouTuber, Entrepeneur, Motivational Speaker, Social Media Influencer, Lifestyle Expert, and public intellectual Tad Ryerson went viral recently, again. In a Ted Talk shared more than that cat video where the cat grabs the cord to the ceiling fan and is flung into the wall, Tad charismatically asserted that Christian morality is curiously inferior and "only another subjective view" of how to organize human communities.

In a passionate Jeremiad against Christian morality, Tad argued, "Christians pass themselves off as moral paragons, but their nationalism, homophobia, environmental obliviousness, and dark-ages sexual ethics are utterly ruining the spirit of equanimity and generosity required to sustain a forward-thinking and cosmopolitan society."

He continued, "The reason Christians can't see the inferiority of their view is that they think they are correct and have been running rough shod over various cultures since the inception of Christianity. If they could see that, in a diverse world, morality is ever evolving, ever changing, as we evolve and change, then they wouldn't be on the wrong side of history, stuck in the dark ages. They would help us advance women's rights, LGBTQ rights, and do other things that align with our superior morality."

We made contact with Dr. Ryerson (his doctoral degree is an honorary doctorate from George Fox University in Portland) and asked him about what he thinks of Muslim morality in America?

In reply, he wrote, "That is a great example of what I'm talking about in my Ted Talk that was shared a few million times and received with thunderous applause and which I am now sharing in a nation wide tour of college campuses. Hegemonic Christians in America are behind all this dreadful intolerance of Muslims. Muslims should be free to express their moral views as freely as anyone. They enrich the conversation. It is unfair to simply shut them down, as Christians no doubt would have us do."

Of course, we had to press a bit, and wanted to know how Dr. Ryerson could hold that the absolutist claims of Muslims in America on these topics are to be graciously heard and seen as equal to other views and that the Christian view is "inferior" and should be silenced through evolutionary "advancement" and even legislation. It seemed to us that there were at least two layers of contradiction in Dr. Ryerson's arguments.

Unfortunately Dr. Ryerson had to end our discussion, saying abruptly that he has chosen to take a different line with racists who are not "global thinkers" and wish only to "put people into oversimple compartments for ease of judgment," and also that he had to finish his research on activating chakras through CrossFit and developing these ideas into a new wellness program.